MAL - Support to National Adult Literacy Programme in Mangochi
| Recipient | Malawi |
|---|---|
| Sector - DAC | Basic life skills for youth and adults - 11230 |
| Type of Aid | Project-Type interventions - C01 |
About the project
| Project Number | MAL11230-0102 |
|---|---|
| Partners | GoM |
| Thereof Implementing Agent | MoGCWCS and ICEIDA |
| Project Title: | MAL - Support to National Adult Literacy Programme in Mangochi |
| Short Description: | To offer literacy and life-skills training to the rural poor and build up capacity among the staff and volunteers of the MoGCCD. |
|
Long Description
The ICEIDA supported Adult Literacy Project in Traditional Authority Nankumba is implemented by the Ministry of Gender, Children and Community Development. It is part of the Malawi Government's efforts to support socio-economic development in the area. Literacy levels in Mangochi District are the lowest in Malawi. It is estimated that only 38 % of women and 59 % of men age 15 years and above are literate. ICEIDA support to the Adult Literacy Project commenced in 2001 with 4 literacy circles. By the year 2009, 94 adult literacy circles have been established in the area with 1695 female and 160 male participants. In November 2009, a total of 1020 literacy participants were assessed to find those who have attained literacy skills. 506 participants passed the test, representing a 49% pass rate. REFLECT (Regenerated Freirean Literacy through Empowering Community Techniques) is the methodology that is used to impart literacy skills to adult learners in this project. According to REFLECT people should not only learn how to read and write, but focus should be on empowering people to take actions in their local communities. Discussion on development issues are thus an integrated part of the literacy circles activities. It is through such discussions that action points are hatched. An action point is a collective action which the adult learners in collaboration with other community members have agreed to embark on, as a solution to their problem. |
|
Period
| Commitment Year | 2001 |
|---|---|
| Final Year | 2010 |
Cross-cutting issues
| Gender | One of four cross-cutting issues in the Malawi Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper is gender equality and women's empowerment, which makes it a central theme in Malawi's development policies.In 2000 the Malawi Government published its National Gender Policy which stipulates the mainstreaming of gender in the national development process. ICEIDA is committed to support development priorities and policies of its partner countries, including efforts to increase gender equality. ICEIDA regards gender equality as pressing social issue and an important factor in the effort to promote human rights and democracy. It is its policy to mainstream gender and gender equality perspectives in all its projdects. Based on this policy environment, the Contracting partners have agreed to make gender perspective and gender equality a cross-cutting issue in this Project. |
|---|---|
| Environment | Other cross-cutting issues that will be actively integrated in the Project's activities throughout the Project Period include environmental protection and sustainability, as well as HIV/Aids awareness and prevention; both important cross cutting issues in the MPRSP. |
Documents
| PD | PD | PD | External Evaluations | External Evaluations | External Evaluations | Other Internal Documents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mal-ALP-Project-Document-2006-2010 | Mal-ALP-Proecess Review-2008 | |||||
| Mal-ALP-Project-Document-2001-2004 | Mal-ALP-External Evaluation-2000-2007 | |||||
Budget
| ICEIDA Amount | $3.341.465 |
|---|---|
| Local Cost | $181.503 |
| Total Project Cost | $3.522.968 |
Aid Effectiveness
| Is this contribution aid to the government sector? | Yes |
|---|---|
| Is this contribution aid to the government sector? | .. |
| Is this contribution aid to the government sector? | .. |
Use of partner country public financial management systems |
|
Use of partner country public financial management systems |
|
Use of partner country public financial management systems |
|
| Are Partner Country budget systems used? | No |
| Are Partner Country budget systems used? | .. |
| Are Partner Country budget systems used? | .. |
| Are partner country financial reporting systems used? | No |
| Are partner country financial reporting systems used? | .. |
| Are partner country financial reporting systems used? | .. |
| Are partner country audit systems used? | No |
| Are partner country audit systems used? | .. |
| Are partner country audit systems used? | .. |
| Are all 3 partner country public financial management systems used? | No |
| Are all 3 partner country public financial management systems used? | .. |
| Are all 3 partner country public financial management systems used? | .. |
| Are partner country procurement systems used? | No |
| Are partner country procurement systems used? | .. |
| Are partner country procurement systems used? | .. |
Use of programme based approaches |
|
| Does the contribution fit within a single programme/budget framework? | Yes |
| Does the contribution fit within a single programme/budget framework? | .. |
| Does the contribution fit within a single programme/budget framework? | .. |
| Is the contribution led by the host country/organisation? | No |
| Is the contribution led by the host country/organisation? | .. |
| Is the contribution led by the host country/organisation? | .. |
| Is there a process for co-ordinating donors? | No |
| Is there a process for co-ordinating donors? | .. |
| Is there a process for co-ordinating donors? | .. |
| Are at least 2 partner country systems being used? | No |
| Are at least 2 partner country systems being used? | .. |
| Are at least 2 partner country systems being used? | .. |
| Is this a programme based approach? | No |
| Is this a programme based approach? | .. |
| Is this a programme based approach? | .. |
| Which MDG (MDG´s) is being targeted? | .. |
| Which MDG (MDG´s) is being targeted? | .. |
| Which MDG (MDG´s) is being targeted? | .. |

